Comments on: Pendulous https://indiegamerchick.com/2012/05/15/pendulous/ Indie and Retro Gaming Reviews from the one and only IGC Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:57:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Indie Gamer Chick https://indiegamerchick.com/2012/05/15/pendulous/#comment-3633 Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:57:32 +0000 http://indiegamerchick.com/?p=3331#comment-3633 In reply to Matthew @//dbg.

Hello Matthew. I have to say, with Star Ninja now the #10 game, the Indie Gamer Chick leaderboard will be extremely tough to crack. Star Ninja has always been for me the barometer, because I believe (and still believe) that it is the XBLIG that has the most potential for mainstream success. And you know what? I can’t wait for someone to knock it off the board.

Don’t forget, there is a top 25 coming July 1.

]]>
By: Matthew @//dbg https://indiegamerchick.com/2012/05/15/pendulous/#comment-3632 Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:51:42 +0000 http://indiegamerchick.com/?p=3331#comment-3632 Kairi, we chatted a bit in e-mail, but I didn’t stop by to leave a comment and say thank you for the review and the honest assessment. Be assured, Pendulous will be back. Now that Chompy Chomp Chomp has rightfully made the top 10 a little harder to get into, our chances for that may be worsening, but I’m still eager to see if we can take care of the reservations in your recommendation.

]]>
By: Matthew @//dbg https://indiegamerchick.com/2012/05/15/pendulous/#comment-3631 Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:46:36 +0000 http://indiegamerchick.com/?p=3331#comment-3631 In reply to GaTechGrad.

Thanks for mentioning it, Grad. Kairi was spot on in the review: the port is the problem. When we brought the game over from the Windows Phone, we made a miscalculation when converting between different screen ratios. It resulted in some nasty clipping that means you’re sometimes in the dark about where to go next.

Not only are we zooming out the camera a little with out next update, I’m going through and hand-tuning the camera at each anchor to make sure the next target or path is more clear. When we kick it back for Second Chance with the Chick, I encourage you to give levels 4 and 5 another shot.

]]>
By: Matthew @//dbg https://indiegamerchick.com/2012/05/15/pendulous/#comment-3630 Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:38:12 +0000 http://indiegamerchick.com/?p=3331#comment-3630 In reply to Matt.

Early on in development, a friend mentioned CarneyVale Showtime and another game called Rotastic. I played both of them and there are definitely similarities. One thing that differentiates them both from Pendulous is item gathering. We’d thought about having cogs or something to pick up along the way in Pendulous, but ultimately decided that forward progress would be our focus and that collection would muddy the simplicity. Also, in those games, speed is generated a little differently; they both use a spin-and-release control scheme, whereas Pendulous is, well…pendulum-esque.

Comparisons aside, I’ll give a nod to Rotastic for their fun multiplayer. Sure it’s played for points and you’re supposed to be collecting gems, but the real joy is cutting other players’ ropes and sending them tumbling to their doom.

]]>
By: GaTechGrad https://indiegamerchick.com/2012/05/15/pendulous/#comment-3623 Sat, 02 Jun 2012 02:22:52 +0000 http://indiegamerchick.com/?p=3331#comment-3623 I just tried this game, and I pretty much agree with everything in the review. Nice presentation, but around level 4 or 5 I couldn’t see the next swing connection. I used the thumbstick controls, which didn’t give me any problems.

]]>
By: Kairi Vice https://indiegamerchick.com/2012/05/15/pendulous/#comment-3469 Sat, 19 May 2012 07:17:10 +0000 http://indiegamerchick.com/?p=3331#comment-3469 In reply to Matt.

I have not. It is in my Katch-Up queue. Looks good. Might hold out a month just because I don’t want to compare two similar games this closely together.

]]>
By: Matt https://indiegamerchick.com/2012/05/15/pendulous/#comment-3468 Sat, 19 May 2012 00:03:45 +0000 http://indiegamerchick.com/?p=3331#comment-3468 Did you ever play Carneyvale Showtime? Might be worth a look to see how it compares to this.

]]>