I’ve taken the liberty of editing your review in order to make it objective – after reading this version, I’m not sure I’ll be purchasing this game :p

Bleed

The story centers around Wryn, a pink-haired chick with dreams of being the biggest hero in gaming history. She decides the best way to go about becoming this is to go around killing all the previous top heroes.

Shooting is done TwickS-style. You can do [double jumping] twice before landing.

You have unlimited ammo and no range-limits, giving your character full 360 degree control over firing upon enemies. The starting weapons [are] a pistol and a rocket launcher. You earn points in every level that you can spend in a shop to unlock alternative guns. Only two can be equipped at a time.

Once you beat the game, extra play modes open.

Bleed was developed by Bootdisk Revolution
400 Microsoft Points said [redacted]

No point in further going. The dude has been name calling and snotty from the get go and I just blocked him from further commenting.

You were right. The implication was that he was older and thus is opinion is more validated. I guess. Thankfully the world doesn’t work like that though.

I can’t read this well, but I’m not the only one who thinks this way in fact allot do, the longer you game or live life the more you realise that opinions are usually far from the truth espicially in gaming ans my guess is most of you have a while.

Seek help.

I’ve been keeping track of this conversation all day and I really have to side with Indie Gamer Chick. If people “just want to know if [a game is] good or not”, then they are asking for an opinion. The quality of a game is entirely subjective based on who happens to be playing it. As a game critic myself, I have to wonder how you expect someone to say something is good or not in an objective way since that implies a value judgement.
The one thing that finally drove me into piping up about this is your comment of “I’m an old gamer” which implies a lot, but mostly that you’re saying that you believe yourself to be more mature or knowledgeable than IGC here. Of course you don’t say that directly, but it wasn’t a subtle or tactful implication.

First of all I never said it was on your end, seconly you still didn’t prove my point and you felt the need to attack when I said something nice.

And I’m pretty damn sure I asked you to repost never demanding it real.mature chick real.mature and what a way to avoid the point.

See though, you’re now advocating against the very thing that earned me my following and popularity. I don’t review like everyone else. There are plenty of generic game critics that are interchangeable with one-another. If I’m not your cup of tea, go to them.

By the way, the glitch was on your end, not mine. For someone who talks about being insulting, you’re the only one calling names and being rude in these comments. You’ve shown impatience when I wasn’t immediately around to approve it.

https://indiegamerchick.com/2011/09/17/dead-pixels/#comment-17253

And now here. I checked with a few people. The comments are showing up just fine, and you’re being a douche about it. I would think someone who would call someone else “Indie Gamer Child” would want to, you know, not act like a spoiled child. Such behavior has no place here.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t be honest, but you can also be morw objective at the same time, but we don’t need to express evert detail of our emotion or thoughts when people google reviews they just want to know if its good or not, they could care less about how we feel.

I can sit here and say I thought dmc was bad just because I’m to attached to the old ones and ao.many smc.fans would exagerate there opinion ans give it lower scores from there dislike of the changes alone and this is wrong and because of mostly fans it got very mixed reviews, the game is actually good. But because of that we may never see another dmc game.

I do like this conversation and ee both are making valid points. And I do believe I misjudged you I’m an old gamer so, I don’t agree with peoples standards of gaming today 100 percent but I do live in the now.

Your Call of Duty example doesn’t work though because you’re basing it on the belief that there will be a universal consensus of how well a game controls. There won’t be. So if I dislike the controls of one game, I shouldn’t say I feel otherwise. Aren’t you in essence advocating for dishonesty in a review? If my reviews don’t contain my true, authentic opinion on a game, what good are they?

And what makes an opinion “silly” versus “valid”. Is it only valid if the opinion agrees with your point of view, and silly if it disagrees?